Bernt
aee0f09db8
- Datafabrik: Dockerfile fix, agentorkestrering fungerar - Vision: Identify-modell, FAISS, OCR alla testade - API: Alla 7 integrationstester passerade - Upplösare: Entitetsupplösning verifierad
1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
Architecture Retrospective — Template
Context
Date: [After burn-in completion]
Participants: [Team members]
Scope: LIFE Runtime 1.0, Weather Intelligence Pipeline
Agenda
1. What Surprised Us?
- What worked better than expected?
- What was harder than anticipated?
- What assumptions proved wrong?
2. What Would We Do Differently?
- Which decisions would we change?
- Which shortcuts hurt us?
- Which investments paid off?
3. Runtime Stability Assessment
- Which components are solid?
- Which need attention?
- What should we lock for 1 year?
4. Domain Separation Review
- Is the Runtime truly domain-agnostic?
- Did Weather Intelligence leak into core?
- What would Traffic Intelligence need?
5. Operational Readiness
- Can we detect failures quickly?
- Can we recover automatically?
- Do we trust our metrics?
6. Documentation Quality
- What's clear?
- What's missing?
- What will new team members struggle with?
Decisions
| Decision | Rationale | Owner | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Action Items
| Item | Owner | Due Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
Runtime Lock
Components locked for 12 months:
- ObservationStore
- RiskEngine
- StateEngine
- EventGenerator
- MissionEngine
- API Contracts
- Data Models
Next Steps
- Complete burn-in analysis
- Certify Runtime 1.0
- Tag release
- Begin Traffic Intelligence (if certified)
This retrospective is part of the certification process for LIFE Runtime 1.0.