Bernt
1a20d41e7e
- DASHBOARD_AUDIT_PROTOCOL.md (v1.0, LOCKED):
- Five criteria: 3-Second Rule, Journey Principle, Reality→Decision,
Dashboard Principle, Decision Density
- Blink Test: 3-second exposure, consistent answers = pass
- Information-to-Decision Ratio: measure objects needed per decision
- Audit form with pass/fail for each criterion
- Decision matrix: all pass = proceed, some fail = adjust Dashboard,
most fail = review Foundation
Rationale: Dashboard is the stress test for Foundation v1.0. If Dashboard
passes without Foundation changes, the base is robust enough to scale.
If Dashboard fails, adjust Dashboard first — not Foundation.
92 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
92 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
# DASHBOARD AUDIT PROTOCOL
|
||
|
||
**Stress Test for Foundation v1.0**
|
||
|
||
| | |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| **Version** | 1.0 |
|
||
| **Status** | LOCKED |
|
||
| **Scope** | Landvex Dashboard validation |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## The Five Criteria
|
||
|
||
| # | Criterion | Question | Pass When... |
|
||
|---|-----------|----------|--------------|
|
||
| 1 | **3-Second Rule** | Do I understand the situation immediately? | User can describe system status in seconds |
|
||
| 2 | **Journey Principle** | Is this the right phase? | Dashboard clearly feels like **Manage** |
|
||
| 3 | **Reality → Decision** | Does information lead to a decision? | Not just statistics — user knows what to do |
|
||
| 4 | **Dashboard Principle** | Are the four questions answered? | What? Where? How serious? What now? |
|
||
| 5 | **Decision Density** | How many decisions are supported? | Max 1–3 clear decisions |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Blink Test
|
||
|
||
**Show the dashboard to someone for 3 seconds.**
|
||
**Close the image. Ask:**
|
||
|
||
1. What was it about?
|
||
2. What was most important?
|
||
3. What would you do now?
|
||
|
||
**Pass:** Answers are consistent across users.
|
||
**Fail:** Answers vary — information hierarchy is unclear.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Information-to-Decision Ratio
|
||
|
||
**Question:** How many information objects must the user read to make their first decision?
|
||
|
||
| Ratio | Assessment |
|
||
|-------|------------|
|
||
| 3 cards → 1 decision | Very good |
|
||
| 5 cards → 1 decision | Good |
|
||
| 10 cards → 1 decision | Warning |
|
||
| 20 widgets → 1 decision | Too much noise |
|
||
|
||
**Rule:** Information exists to enable decisions, not to fill the screen.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Audit Form
|
||
|
||
| Check | Result | Notes |
|
||
|-------|--------|-------|
|
||
| 3-Second Rule | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | |
|
||
| Journey Principle (Manage) | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | |
|
||
| Reality → Decision | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | |
|
||
| Dashboard Principle (4 questions) | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | |
|
||
| Decision Density (1–3) | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | |
|
||
| Blink Test (consistent answers) | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | |
|
||
| Information-to-Decision Ratio | [number] | |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Decision
|
||
|
||
| Result | Meaning |
|
||
|--------|---------|
|
||
| **All pass** | Foundation v1.0 is validated. Proceed with components. |
|
||
| **Some fail** | Adjust Dashboard, not Foundation. Re-audit. |
|
||
| **Most fail** | Review Foundation v1.0 for gaps. |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## ändringshistoria
|
||
|
||
| Version | Datum | Beskrivning |
|
||
|---------|-------|-------------|
|
||
| 1.0 | 2026-07-02 | Initial dashboard audit protocol for Foundation v1.0 validation |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## STATUS
|
||
|
||
**LOCKED**
|
||
|
||
- Mindre revideringar: 1.x-serien
|
||
- Brytande ändringar: Kräver Architecture Review, ny major-version (2.0+)
|